Research on the Mechanism of Digital Finance Empowering New Quality Productivity

Authors

  • Yong Luo School of Economics, Management and Law, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, P.R. China
  • Qiaomu Li School of Economics, Management and Law, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, P.R. China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/z2w82z82

Keywords:

Digital finance, New-type productivity, Mechanism, Interaction

Abstract

With the deepening development of the digital economy, digital finance, as a critical enabling factor, has played an increasingly important role in optimizing resource allocation, stimulating technological innovation, and driving industrial transformation, thereby exerting a systematic impact on the formation and evolution of new-type productivity. Based on an integration of cutting-edge domestic and international theories and empirical studies, this paper constructs a multi-path framework elucidating how digital finance empowers new-type productivity. It systematically identifies five dimensions through which digital finance promotes qualitative upgrades in productivity: reorganization of capital and optimization of resource allocation, support for technological innovation and cultivation of innovation ecosystems, industrial upgrading and intelligent transformation, enhancement of risk governance capacity, and valorization of data assets alongside organizational restructuring. Furthermore, the study proposes a bidirectional feedback model between digital finance and new-type productivity, emphasizing their symbiotic evolution within a “technology–finance–industry” triadic interaction. The findings indicate that digital finance provides a stable, efficient, and resilient driving force for the sustained development of new-type productivity through systemic mechanisms, synergistic pathways, and ecosystem-based networks. Theoretically, the paper deepens the conceptual understanding of new-type productivity and extends the analytical boundaries of digital finance research; practically, it offers systematic policy and industrial-finance integration insights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Levine R. Finance and growth: theory and evidence [J]. Handbook of economic growth, 2005, 1: 865-934.

[2] Philippon T. The fintech opportunity [R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2016.

[3] Romer P M. Endogenous technological change [J]. Journal of political Economy, 1990, 98(5, Part 2): S71-S102.

[4] Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A. The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies [M]. WW Norton & company, 2014.

[5] Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor [J]. Journal of economic perspectives, 2019, 33(2): 3-30.

[6] ZHANG Lin, PU Qingping. The connotation characteristic, theoretical innovation and value implication of new quality productivity [J]. Journal of Magnesium and Alloy, 2024, 29(6): 137-148.

[7] Zhou J, Wang Y. Research on the Configuration Paths of New Quality Productive Forces Driven by Science and Technology Finance Ecosystem [J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(20): 9310.

[8] Gu F, Gao J, Zhu X, et al. The impact of digital inclusive finance on SMEs’ technological innovation activities—Empirical analysis based on the data of new third board enterprises [J]. Plos one, 2023, 18(11): e0293500.

[9] Yi S, Qi Y, Ya Y, et al. The impact of China’s digital inclusive financial development gap on the optimization of rural consumption structure [J]. Plos one, 2024, 19(8): e0308412.

[10] Xu Y, Zhang S. Digital Finance, New Quality Productive Forces, and Government Environmental Governance: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Provincial Panel Data [J]. International Journal of Financial Studies, 2025, 13(3): 129.

[11] Chen Y. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Digital Finance on the New Quality Productive Forces of Enterprises [C]//SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2025, 218: 01002.

[12] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations [J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173.

[13] Hansen B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference [J]. Journal of econometrics, 1999, 93(2): 345-368.

Downloads

Published

29-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Luo, Y., & Li, Q. (2026). Research on the Mechanism of Digital Finance Empowering New Quality Productivity. International Journal of World Economic Research, 1(3), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.54097/z2w82z82