Government Subsidy Strategy Considering Weather Options under Adverse Weather Conditions

Authors

  • Ouyang Qi School of Management, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/6hrh0892

Keywords:

Agricultural product supply chain, adverse weather, weather index, weather options, government subsidies

Abstract

Under the joint impact of adverse weather and demand uncertainty, fresh agricultural product supply chains (FAPSCs) face significant challenges, including yield volatility, quality deterioration, and price instability. To address these issues, this paper develops a two-echelon supply chain model consisting of an agricultural cooperative and a retailer. A weather index is introduced to capture the joint effects of weather conditions on both yield and product quality, while weather options are incorporated as financial instruments for risk hedging. We consider three policy scenarios: no government subsidy, subsidies to the agricultural cooperative, and subsidies to the retailer. A Stackelberg game framework is established to analyze the optimal decisions of supply chain members and evaluate their economic performance under different subsidy schemes. The results show that adverse weather reduces agricultural input investment and leads to higher wholesale and retail prices, thereby decreasing supply chain profits and social welfare. Government subsidies can effectively mitigate the negative impacts of weather uncertainty. Moreover, different subsidy schemes have heterogeneous effects, and subsidizing the agricultural cooperative is more effective in reducing wholesale prices, increasing input investment, and improving overall social welfare. In addition, weather options significantly enhance the supply chain’s ability to hedge weather risks and improve system stability. his study provides theoretical insights for optimizing government subsidy policies and integrating financial derivatives into agricultural risk management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] LiuY J, Chen Y H. Risk decision for dual-channel supply chain of agricultural products under disturbance [J], International Journal for Engineering Modelling, 2018, 31(4):15-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31534/engmod.2018.4.si.02g

[2] Muriana C. An EOQ model for perishable products with fixed shelf life under stochastic demand conditions [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 255(2): 388-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.036

[3] Sall S. Environmental food taxes and inequalities: Simulation of a meat tax in Sweden [J]. Food Policy, 2018, 74(3): 147-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.12.007

[4] Peng H J, Pang T. Optimal strategies for a three-level contract farming supply chain with subsidy [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 216(4): 274-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.011

[5] Kazaz B, Webster S, Yadav P. Interventions for an artemisinin-based malaria medicine supply chain [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2016, 25(9): 1576-1600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12574

[6] Omkar D. Palsule-Desai. Cooperatives for fruits and vegetables in emerging countries: Rationalization and impact of decentralization [J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2015, 81(5): 114-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.06.011

[7] Zheng Q, Leromonachou P, Fan T, et al. Supply chain contracting coordination for fresh products with fresh-keeping effort [J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2017, 117(3): 538-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0139

[8] Yu J, Sumner D A. Effects of subsidized crop insurance on crop choices [J]. Agricultural Economics, 2018, 49(4): 533-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12434

[9] Srivastava H S, Wood L C. Cloud Computing to Improve Agri-Supply Chains in Developing Countries [M]. IGI Global, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch101

[10] ChengY, Li H, Thorstenson A. Advance selling with double marketing efforts in a newsvendor framework [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 118(5): 352-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.006

[11] Zhou Y, Che Y. Research on government logistics subsidies for poverty alleviation with non-uniform distribution of consumers [J]. Omega, 2021, 104:102489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2021.102489

[12] Li, Jian, Panos Kouvelis, and Maqbool Dada. Agricultural Supply Chains in Emerging Markets: Competition and Cooperation under Correlated Yields. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 2024, Vol. 26 (No. 2), p. 664-680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0076

[13] Fu, Hong Yong, Jia Wen Li, and Jun Hu Ruan. Risk Transfer Mechanism of Contract Farming Supply Chain Based on Weather Index Insurance. Journal of Systems Engineering. 2023, Vol. 38 (No. 01), p. 86-100.

[14] Tang, Christopher S., Yulan Wang, and Ming Zhao. The Impact of Input and Output Farm Subsidies on Farmer Welfare, Income Disparity, and Consumer Surplus. Management Science. 2024, Vol. 70 (No. 5), p. 3144-3161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4850

[15] Shi, Yan, and Fulin Wang. Agricultural Supply Chain Coordination under Weather-Related Uncertain Yield. Sustainability. 2022, Vol. 14 (No. 9), p. 5271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095271

Downloads

Published

24-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Qi, O. (2026). Government Subsidy Strategy Considering Weather Options under Adverse Weather Conditions. International Journal of World Economic Research, 1(3), 24-28. https://doi.org/10.54097/6hrh0892