Research on Quality Evaluation of Landscape Resources and Its Spatial Visualization in the Chengdu-Chongqing Yangtze River Tourism Corridor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/5dmn6z07Keywords:
Landscape Quality, Spatial Visualization, Chengdu-Chongqing Yangtze River Tourism Belt, GIS, AHPAbstract
The Chengdu-Chongqing Yangtze River Tourism Belt is a core area for the construction of the Yangtze National Cultural Park. Scientifically evaluating its landscape quality is of great significance for regional cultural and tourism integration and ecological value conversion. This paper constructs an 8-indicator evaluation system containing two dimensions of visual perception and resource endowment, coupling Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and GIS spatial analysis technology to quantitatively measure and spatially visualize the corridor landscape quality. The results show that: (1) The spatial differentiation of landscape quality is significant, showing a gradient pattern of "High in East, Low in Middle, Stable in West". The high-value area is concentrated in the Fuling to Wushan section of Chongqing, and the low-value area is embedded in the Chongqing main city urban area. (2) Indicator weights show that Openness and Naturalness are the dominant factors, with a combined weight of over 42%, indicating that visual corridor permeability and ecological endowment authenticity are the core of quality evaluation. (3) The high-intensity urbanization process produces a "double shielding" effect on the core high-weight factors, which is the main cause of the "collapse" of landscape quality in the middle section. Based on this, a segmented differentiated control strategy of strict protection in the east section, restoration and improvement in the middle section, and optimization and enhancement in the west section is proposed, so as to provide a scientific basis for the planning of the Yangtze National Cultural Park.
Downloads
References
[1] Li Yingyu, Sun Qiaoqi, Zou Hongfei. Research Trends, Methods, and Prospects of Natural Landscape Assessment in Protected Areas[J]. Protected Areas, 2025, 5(3): 70-81.
[2] Liu Binyi. Towards Landscape Perception: The Inheritance and Development of Landscape Perception and Visual Assessment[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022(9): 12-17.
[3] Landscape Quality Evaluation of Hefei Binhu National Forest Park Based on GIS[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2024(9).
[4] Comprehensive Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Scenic Beauty Estimation in Plant Landscape Evaluation[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(11).
[5] Li Kejian, Zhao Qing, Luo Hao, et al. Landscape Health Assessment of Suburban Forest Parks: A Case Study of Guangdong Yunyong National Forest Park[J]. Guangdong Academy of Forestry, 2025.
[6] Plan for the Construction and Protection of the Yangtze River National Cultural Park[Z]. 2025.
[7] Li Daichao, Zhong Shuxuan, Yu Hu. Research Progress on Landscape Function Assessment[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(16): 7401-7415.
[8] Wu Jun, Xu Yuanyuan, Ren Jianlan, et al. Progress in Landscape Preference Research and Its Response to Geographical Perspectives[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(4): 656-663. DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.04.012.
[9] Shayestefar M, Pazhouhanfar M, van Oel C, et al. Exploring the influence of the visual attributes of Kaplan's preference matrix in the assessment of urban parks: A discrete choice analysis[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(12): 7357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127357
[10] Van der Jagt A P N, Craig T, Anable J, et al. Unearthing the picturesque: The validity of the preference matrix as a measure of landscape aesthetics[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 124: 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.006
[11] Zhang G, Yang J, Jing J. Assessing relations among landscape preference, informational variables, and visual attributes[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 2021, 29(3): 294-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2021.15584
[12] Buket S, Ekin O H, Isami K. An empirical research study on prospect-refuge theory and the effect of high-rise buildings in a Japanese garden setting[J]. City Territory & Architecture, 2018, 5(1): 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-018-0079-3
[13] Shen Jiake, Chen Zhaofang, Peng Zhenwei, et al. Development and Prospects of Rural Landscape Character Assessment in China[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2022, 29(3): 19-24. DOI:10.14085/j.fjyl.2022.03.0019.06.
[14] Wei Fang, Xu Jing, Fan Mao, et al. Research on the Perception of Coherence and Legibility of Post-Industrial Landscapes in the Context of Sustainable Regeneration[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2023, 30(6): 27-34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of World Economic Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









