The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Executive Compensation in Listed Companies

Authors

  • Jianan Shen Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/sbq95v49

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Executive Compensation, Corporate Governance, Compensation Distribution

Abstract

As artificial intelligence is elevated to a national strategic level and deeply integrated into the real economy, its core role in driving industrial upgrading and economic growth has become increasingly prominent. Executives, as key decision-makers in corporate strategy, have compensation levels that not only relate to agency costs and incentive effectiveness but also influence the fairness and efficiency of internal income distribution within enterprises against the backdrop of technological change. Based on data from A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2023, this study employs textual analysis to construct a firm-level indicator of AI application and systematically examines the impact of AI on executive compensation. The findings are as follows: First, AI significantly increases the compensation levels of executives in listed companies. This conclusion remains robust after addressing endogeneity concerns through methods such as instrumental variable approaches and conducting a series of robustness tests. Second, mechanism tests reveal that AI indirectly promotes the growth of executive compensation through three pathways: alleviating financing constraints, enhancing enterprise total factor productivity, and increasing the level of executive human capital. Third, the level of corporate governance plays a negative moderating role between AI and executive compensation, suggesting that sound internal governance mechanisms can effectively curb the potential expansion of managerial power and the capture of excess returns by executives during technological change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Meckling W H, Jensen M C. Theory of the Firm. Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. 1976, Vol. 3 (No. 4), p. 305-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

[2] Zhang Lieke, Zhang Qian, Liu Bin. Does Accounting Information Comparability Affect the Effectiveness of Executive Compensation Contracts?. China Soft Science. 2019 (No. 2), p. 110-127.

[3] Tan Zhidong, Zhao Xun, Pan Jun, et al. The Value of Digital Transformation: Based on the Perspective of Corporate Cash Holdings. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2022 (No. 4), p. 64-78.

[4] Aghion P, Jones B F, Jones C I. Artificial intelligence and economic growth. US: University of Chicago Press, 2018. p. 237-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w23928

[5] Gabaix X, Landier A. Why has CEO pay increased so much?. The quarterly journal of economics. 2008, Vol. 123 (No. 1), p. 49-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.49

[6] Frydman C, Papanikolaou D. In search of ideas: Technological innovation and executive pay inequality. Journal of Financial Economics. 2018, Vol. 130 (No. 1), p. 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.014

[7] Yang Hanming, Chen Guoying, Yan Zi. An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Underinvestment on Sustainable Growth of Enterprises. Statistics and Decision. 2019, Vol. 35 (No. 11), p. 167-170.

[8] Zhang Youtang, Chang Yuming. An Empirical Test of the Impact of Digital Finance on the Investment Efficiency of Technology-based Enterprises. Statistics and Decision. 2020, Vol. 36 (No. 16), p. 179-183.

[9] Nie Xingkai, Wang Wenhua, Pei Xuan. Does Corporate Digital Transformation Affect Accounting Information Comparability. Accounting Research. 2022 (No. 05), p. 17-39.

[10] Lu Qiang, Deng Yang, Song Hua. Research on the Impact of Digital Capabilities of SMEs on Supply Chain Financing Performance Based on Transaction Cost Theory. Chinese Journal of Management. 2023, Vol. 20 (No. 11), p. 1696-1705.

[11] Yu Kun, Li Zhiguo, Zhang Xiaorong, et al. The Puzzle of Corporate Investment Efficiency: Financing Constraints Hypothesis and Monetary Policy Shocks. Economic Research Journal. 2014, Vol. 49 (No. 5), p. 106-120.

[12] Luo Chuliang, Li Shi. Human Capital, Industry Characteristics and Income Gap: An Empirical Study Based on the First National Economic Census Data. Management World. 2007 (No. 10), p. 19-30+171.

[13] Wang Wei, Guo Xinqiang, Ai Chunrong. Financing Constraints, Decline in Labor Income Share and Low Consumption in China. Economic Research Journal. 2013, Vol. 48 (No. 11), p. 100-113.

[14] Ding Feng. Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology and Total Factor Productivity of Listed Companies. Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics. 2024, Vol. 42 (No. 10), p. 56-69.

[15] Yao Jiaquan, Zhang Kunpeng, Guo Lipeng, Feng Xu. How Does Artificial Intelligence Enhance Corporate Productivity? — Based on the Perspective of Labor Skill Structure Adjustment. Management World. 2024 (No. 2), p. 101-133.

[16] Autor D H. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of economic perspectives. 2015, Vol. 29 (No. 3), p. 3-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3

[17] Frey C B, Osborne M A. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?. Technological forecasting and social change. 2017, Vol. 114, p. 254-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

[18] Edwards J S, Duan Y, Robins P C. An analysis of expert systems for business decision making at different levels and in different roles. European Journal of Information Systems. 2000, Vol. 9 (No. 1), p. 36-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000344

[19] Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of economic perspectives. 2019, Vol. 33 (No. 2), p. 3-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3

[20] Li Zhiqiang, Liu Ying, Wei Lin. Research on the Influence Path of Skill Premium in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Contemporary Finance & Economics. 2022 (No. 7), p. 16-26.

[21] Acemoglu D, Autor D. Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics. 2011 (No. 4), p. 1043-1171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5

[22] Wang J, Hu Y, Zhang Z M. Skill - biased Technological Change and Labor Market Polarization in China. Economic Modelling. 2021, Vol. 100 (No. 3), p. 105507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105507

[23] Liu Qiren, Zhao Can. Tax Policy Incentives and Corporate Human Capital Upgrading. Economic Research Journal. 2020 (No. 4), p. 70-85.

[24] Zhao Chenyu, Wang Wenchun, Li Xuesong. How Does Digital Transformation Affect Corporate Total Factor Productivity. Finance & Trade Economics. 2021 (No. 7), p. 114-129.

[25] Li Shicong. Calculation of Human Capital Contribution Rate and Design of Executive Compensation Model for Business Managers. Talent Resources Development. 2005 (No. 11), p. 28-30.

[26] Fan Yadong, Zhang Qi, Yan Yu. Executive Incentive Intensity and Enterprise Development: The Moderating Role of Top Management Team Human Capital. Commercial Research. 2016 (No. 10), p. 101-108.

[27] Chen Deqiu, Bu Danlu. Management Ability, Power Characteristics and Pay Gap. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics. 2015, Vol. 37 (No. 3), p. 91-101.

[28] Li Linfang, Wang Ye. Management Power, Media Attention and Internal Control Quality. Communication of Finance and Accounting. 2023 (No. 4), p. 46-49.

[29] Yin Zhifeng, Cao Aijia, Guo Jiabao, et al. Research on the Employment Effect of Artificial Intelligence Based on Patent Data--Micro Evidence from Zhongguancun Enterprises. China Industrial Economics. 2023 (No. 5), p. 137-154.

[30] Hu Nan, Xue Fujing, Wang Haonan. Does Managerial Myopia Affect Long-Term Corporate Investment ?--Based on Text Analysis and Machine Learning. Management World. 2021, Vol. 37 (No. 05), p. 139-156.

Downloads

Published

09-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shen, J. (2026). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Executive Compensation in Listed Companies. International Journal of World Economic Research, 1(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.54097/sbq95v49